Omnisaura

Dinosaur genus

Saurornithoides

Osborn 1924

Saurornithoides is a dinosaur genus known from bones, found in rocks 83.6–66 million years old, in 4 countries, most often Mongolia and China.

Confidence labels
How sure are we?3 high4 medium8 lowHow we rate confidence

Confidence labels are switched off. Facts with low confidence, or where sources disagree, still carry a small dot: tap it for the reason.

At a glance

Data as of 12 October 2026
83.6–66 Ma
Triassic
Jurassic
Cretaceous
252 million years ago20114366

Solid: the ages of its dated fossils, 83.6–66 million years ago (Omnisaura's calculation). Pale: the published range, 100.5–66 million years ago, which also counts records Omnisaura leaves out.

The last non-bird dinosaurs died out 66 million years ago. That's as far from us as the end of this bar.

Named by
Osborn 1924
highhigh: PBDB and Wikidata agree.
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database. How it was chosen: PBDB leads.

Described in
H. F. Osborn (1924). Three new Theropoda, Protoceratops zone, central Mongolia. American Museum Novitates 144: 1–12.
highhigh: PBDB gives this publication for the name; its author and year match the naming authority (Osborn 1924), on which PBDB and Wikidata agree.
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database. The publication the Paleobiology Database gives as the authority for this genus name, usually the one that first named and described it.

Lived
Cenomanian to Maastrichtian, 100.5–66 million years ago
highhigh: PBDB and NHM agree.
Omnisaura calculation83.6–66 million years ago, from its dated fossil records
mediummedium: Omnisaura's calculation from 3 confirmed PBDB records.
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database. How it was chosen: PBDB leads.

Fossils found in
Mongolia
mediummedium: Only PBDB records it (2 records).
China
lowlow: Only one PBDB record.
United States
disputedlow: NHM records it here but PBDB has no record in this country; awaiting an editor.
Uzbekistan
lowlow: Only one PBDB record.
mixedmixed: Levels differ between entries; each has its own.
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database; Natural History Museum Data Portal. How it was chosen: Union of all sources (ISO 3166).

Rock formations
Bayan Mandahu
lowlow: Only one PBDB record.
Djadokhta
lowlow: Only one PBDB record.
Khodzhakul
lowlow: Only one PBDB record.
Lance Formation
disputedlow: Only NHM gives this name and it matches no PBDB formation; awaiting an editor.
Nemegt
lowlow: Only one PBDB record.
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database; Natural History Museum Data Portal. How it was chosen: Canonical names, automatic and editor-approved matches applied.

Family
Troodontidae
mediummedium: Only PBDB gives this; nothing contradicts it.
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database. How it was chosen: PBDB leads.

Parent group
Saurornithoidini
mediummedium: Only PBDB gives this; nothing contradicts it.
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database. How it was chosen: PBDB leads.

Known from
Bones
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database (what the name was based on).

Sources: Omnisaura editorial (Omnisaura editorial content (© Future Sailors, all rights reserved)), Paleobiology Database (CC BY 4.0), Natural History Museum Data Portal (CC0 1.0), Wikidata (CC0 1.0)Confidence levels and gaps are Omnisaura's own assessment.

Gaps are answers

What isn't known yet

  • Type species: no source we use gives it yet.
  • Order: no source we use gives it yet.
  • Common names: no source we use gives it yet.
  • What it was named after: no source we use gives it yet.
  • Held back: 4 fossil records left out: identified only tentatively (for example "cf." or "?").
  • Resting on one source: 2 facts come from a single source with nothing against them (rated medium): parent group (PBDB); family (PBDB).

Size, diet and behaviour aren't covered yet. Omnisaura leaves them out rather than guess.

Where sources disagree

2 open

Formations

  • NonePBDB
  • Lance FormationNHM

One source names a formation the other does not. An editor hasn't ruled yet, so this is rated low until they do.

Countries

  • CN, MN, UZPBDB
  • United StatesNHM

One source records a country the other does not. An editor hasn't ruled yet, so this is rated low until they do.

Did it meet…?

?

Same time, different places. Their fossils overlap in age, 83.6 to 66 million years ago, but no rock formation holds both.

Going by the ages and rock formations of their dated fossils, as on the map. Compare their fossil sites on the map.

Lived alongside

Genera found in the same rock formations, from rocks of the same age.

Credits

Where this page comes from

Pictures linked from this page are credited beside each one, with their own licences; the full list is in the JSON download.