Footprint type
Deltapodus
Deltapodus is a footprint type: the name is for the fossil footprints themselves. The animal that made them is not known for certain. Its footprints are found in rocks 174.7–125.8 million years old in 6 countries, most often Spain and Portugal.
Confidence labels are switched off. Facts with low confidence, or where sources disagree, still carry a small dot: tap it for the reason.
At a glance
Data as of 12 October 2026- Named by
- Whyte and Romano 1995
medium
medium: Only PBDB gives this; nothing contradicts it.Sources
Given by: Paleobiology Database. How it was chosen: PBDB leads.
- Described in
- M. A. Whyte, M. Romano (1995). Probable sauropod footprints from the Middle Jurassic of Yorkshire, England. Aspects of Sauropod Paleobiology. GAIA 10: 15–26.
medium
medium: Only PBDB gives this; its author and year match the naming authority (Whyte and Romano 1995).Sources
Given by: Paleobiology Database. The publication the Paleobiology Database gives as the authority for this genus name, usually the one that first named and described it.
- Type species
- Deltapodus brodricki
medium
medium: Only PBDB gives this; nothing contradicts it.Sources
Given by: Paleobiology Database. How it was chosen: PBDB leads.
- Dated to
- Aalenian to Maastrichtian, 174.7–66 million years ago
medium
medium: Only PBDB gives this; nothing contradicts it.Omnisaura calculation174.7–125.8 million years ago, from its dated fossil recordsmedium
medium: Omnisaura's calculation from 22 confirmed PBDB records.Sources
Given by: Paleobiology Database. How it was chosen: PBDB leads.
- Found in
- ChinaPortugal
medium
medium: Only PBDB records it (3 records).Spainmedium
medium: Only PBDB records it (6 records).United Kingdommedium
medium: Only PBDB records it (13 records).Francemedium
medium: Only PBDB records it (4 records).Indialow
low: Only one PBDB record.low
low: Only one PBDB record.mixed
mixed: Levels differ between entries; each has its own.Sources
Given by: Paleobiology Database. How it was chosen: Union of all sources (ISO 3166).
- Rock formations
- 14, including Lourinhã, Villar del Arzobispo, Hutubihe and Saltwick
mixed
mixed: Levels differ between entries; each has its own.Show all 14, each with its confidence
ArtolesCamarillasmedium
medium: Only PBDB records it (3 records).Hutubihemedium
medium: Only PBDB records it (2 records).Lourinhãmedium
medium: Only PBDB records it (2 records).Saltwickmedium
medium: Only PBDB records it (6 records).Villar del Arzobispomedium
medium: Only PBDB records it (2 records).El Castellarmedium
medium: Only PBDB records it (4 records).Huérteleslow
low: Only one PBDB record.Lametalow
low: Only one PBDB record.Lealt Shalelow
low: Only one PBDB record.Magañalow
low: Only one PBDB record.Scalbylow
low: Only one PBDB record.Tereñeslow
low: Only one PBDB record.Yananlow
low: Only one PBDB record.low
low: Only one PBDB record.Sources
Given by: Paleobiology Database. How it was chosen: Canonical names, automatic and editor-approved matches applied.
- Parent group
- Stegosauria
medium
medium: Only PBDB gives this; nothing contradicts it.Sources
Given by: Paleobiology Database. How it was chosen: PBDB leads.
- Known from
- Footprints and traces
Sources
Given by: Paleobiology Database (what the name was based on).
- Made by
- Not known for certain. Footprints rarely show which animal made them.
Gaps are answers
What isn't known yet
- The animal that made them: not known for certain, as for most footprint types.
- Order: no source we use gives it yet.
- Family: no source we use gives it yet.
- Common names: no source we use gives it yet.
- What it was named after: no source we use gives it yet.
- Held back: 7 fossil records left out: identified only tentatively (for example "cf." or "?").
- Resting on one source: 4 facts come from a single source with nothing against them (rated medium): authority (PBDB); type species (PBDB); parent group (PBDB); age (headline) (PBDB).
Size, diet and behaviour aren't covered yet. Omnisaura leaves them out rather than guess.
Where sources disagree
None open. Where our sources overlap, they agree on everything shown here.
Did it meet…?
No. Deltapodus had gone at least 42.2 million years before Tyrannosaurus appears in the fossil record.
Going by the ages and rock formations of their dated fossils, as on the map. Compare their fossil sites on the map.
Found in the same rocks
Genera and other fossil types from the same formations, from rocks of the same age.
Credits
Where this page comes from
- Paleobiology DatabaseCC BY 4.0 · fossil records, ages, classification
- WikidataCC0 1.0 · names and identifiers
- OmnisauraOmnisaura editorial · confidence levels and gaps
- PaleoMAP PaleoCoastlines (Kocsis and Scotese 2021)CC BY 4.0 · ancient coastlines on the small map
- Natural EarthPublic domain · today's coastlines
Pictures linked from this page are credited beside each one, with their own licences; the full list is in the JSON download.